Panel health at a glance.
Track interview quality, consistency, and adoption across the whole hiring org — and see which interviewers need attention.
342
Interviews (90 days)
▲ 12% vs prior
4.3
Avg candidate experience
▲ 0.2
68%
Full competency coverage
Target 90%
3
Interviewers flagged
of 24 active
Interview quality trend
Composite of conduct, coverage, and evidence — monthly.
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Rating consistency across interviewers
Average rating given vs. the panel average — outliers may be over- or under-rating.
Priya N.
3.2
Marcus B.
3.0
Sofia R.
3.1
Dan O. outlier
2.6
Tom W.
3.3
These are signals to investigate, not verdicts. Reflect surfaces statistical patterns and potential bias; a human decides what they mean.
Quality by team
| Team | Interviews | Candidate exp. | Coverage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 168 | 4.1 | 64% | Watch |
| Product | 72 | 4.5 | 88% | Healthy |
| Design | 54 | 4.6 | 91% | Healthy |
| Data | 48 | 4.0 | 59% | Watch |
Adoption
Data only flows if the process is used.
Candidate feedback response73%
Scorecards submitted88%
Scorecards with evidence61%
Avg time to submit1.4d
Needs attention
Interviewers below quality thresholds.
Dan O.Low evidence, outlier ratings
Ravi K.Frequently starts late
Lena M.Low coverage on rubric
Export
Share panel health with leadership.